<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WebPage Redirection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nsfw.ibnmasud.com/3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nsfw.ibnmasud.com/3/</link>
	<description>Safe for Work</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nabil Khan</title>
		<link>http://nsfw.ibnmasud.com/3/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabil Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nsfw.ibnmasud.com/archives/3#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Great post, thanks.  I have one comment regarding the HTML redirect.  You mentioned in the disadvantages that, "Using the back button will take you back to the redirect page which will then redirect you again. Firefox, Opera, and Safari ignore this behavior and IE users can double-click the back button."

I am using this method on my website and after redirection, if I click the back button, it does not take me to the redirect page.  I am using firefox.  I also check and it work smoothly with IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, thanks.  I have one comment regarding the HTML redirect.  You mentioned in the disadvantages that, &#8220;Using the back button will take you back to the redirect page which will then redirect you again. Firefox, Opera, and Safari ignore this behavior and IE users can double-click the back button.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am using this method on my website and after redirection, if I click the back button, it does not take me to the redirect page.  I am using firefox.  I also check and it work smoothly with IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
